Audiotaped or taped and later transcribing. Coders utilized written transcripts along with audiotapes. And videotaped recordings to identify the client and therapist’s behaviors. The FFT model served as the foundation to identify diverse kinds of specific therapist behavior. As well as subtle therapeutic processes and reactions of clients. That the videotape sessions were not without incident. One group of undergraduate coders analyzed the transcripts and classified therapy.
Killinger’s Coding Manual of Client Attitude. Coding involved classifying verbal expressions using a Likert scale of 7 points. That ranged from (client exhibits a very negative attitude) up to from 1 (client displays. A very negative attitude) to (client displays a remarkable open and a positive and positive attitude). A score of 4 indicates an unfavorable attitude response. Every family member responds during the session. The statements scored; but, only those statements. That immediately preceded or followed statements from therapists the analyses included these data. Kappa was the average for this study.
The raters’ group was disagreements between more than one event that occurred. In less than one percent of the time. The summary unit in this study. The speech act was the main one; that is, the therapist. And family members’ member statements are bound by both sides. Remarks within the meeting. Speech is a form of communication that included single-word phrases to monologues. That stretched across several pages of the transcript.
Examined the speech of the therapist. And identified the category in the category to which the statement was made. When the making of In these instances, coders focused on the meaningful segment (coding units). Which contained relevant information that was crucial to determine. The right categorization for the speech act. Because speech acts were often a mix of ideas or ideas, it was it is possible for the statement to receive many codes.
Coders trained to scrutinize only the contents of the specific information in assigning a code. In other, they were coding frames. And reframe in therapy instructed to pay close attention to the client statements. That was before made in the course. Coders were also advised to think about. The particularity was the fact that families who they watching the fact that. They were taking part in family therapy for the purpose of a specific request problem. For instance, a therapist A statement that sought to normalize family life. Or the behavior of the teenager viewed in the context of family involvement in therapy. So, these statements are normalizing.
These are seen as non-blaming and inconsistent with pejorative. And negative attributions by relatives participants into therapy. So these statements of normalization were frames. Contrary to this, frames were simple reflections. The recollections of family members’ opinions about their relationship when they began therapy. This method of coding gave sensitive data in the form of a relationship. Between the two also to the unconscious, private nature of the therapeutic. Relationships as well as beliefs that family members make. so the coding frames and frames that were reframed required a very high level of coder inference. Family members’ internal states of mind and extraordinary. Comprehension of the therapeutic context the context in which these behaviors took place.
We designed the code for the therapists’ organizational statements to determine therapist statements. That the family members directed to therapy, guided. The therapy sessions and supervised behaviors during the session. And also outlined the physical aspects of the therapeutic environment.
For more details regarding business